Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Loudness adaptation: fact or artifact?

Keith S Jones1, Ernest M Weiler, Joel S Warm

  • 1Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, USA. keith.s.jones@ttu.edu

The Journal of General Psychology
|December 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Perceptions of Caller Honesty Vary During Vishing Attacks That Include Highly Sensitive or Seemingly Innocuous Requests.

Human factors·2021
Same author

Does lacking information about your affordances impact your perception of others' affordances? A test of the embodied simulation hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2020
Same author

Do exploratory arm movements contribute to maximum reach distance judgements?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2020
Same author

Vigilance Tasks: Unpleasant, Mentally Demanding, and Stressful Even When Time Flies.

Human factors·2018
Same author

Training Techniques for Visual Search in Complex Task Environments.

Human factors·2017
Same author

The Neuroergonomics of Vigilance.

Human factors·2017
Same journal

The influence of the Big Five personality traits on daily internal and external aggression tendencies: a dual-pathway mechanism from the perspective of social comparison theory-a diary study.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive and emotional benefits of piano training: effects on working memory and psychological well-being.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

The efficacy of mindfulness based interventions in mitigating stress and fostering enhanced mindfulness among higher education students.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Age and gender differences in the factor structure of cognitive monitoring.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

How social context modulates the roles of fairness, reciprocity, and empathy on advantageous inequity aversion.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Predicting a few or many friends in schoolchildren: a machine learning approach.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
See all related articles

The Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP) accurately measures loudness adaptation. This study found that contrast effects do not confound the ICP, validating its use in audiology research.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Audiology

Background:

  • The Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP) is used to measure loudness adaptation.
  • Concerns exist that contrast effects may confound ICP results.
  • Contrast effects involve perceived changes in stimulus intensity due to preceding stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that contrast effects confound the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP).
  • To determine if the ICP is a valid measure of loudness adaptation.
  • To investigate the impact of bidirectional referents on loudness perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized bidirectional referents where base tones (50 or 70 dB) alternated with more or less intense referents.
  • A 3.5-minute listening period was employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured loudness changes over time in base tones and referents.
  • Main Results:

    • Contrary to the contrast hypothesis, base-tone loudness significantly declined over time.
    • Referent loudness also significantly declined over time.
    • Observed loudness declines were not nullified by opposing contrast effects.

    Conclusions:

    • The Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP) is a valid measure, free from confounding contrast effects.
    • Broad-based loudness adaptation can be reliably assessed using the ICP.
    • The study supports the ICP's utility in audiological research and auditory perception studies.