Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Treating atrial fibrillation: rhythm control or rate control.

Marilyn A Prasun1, Abraham G Kocheril

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Carle Clinic, Urbana, Ill, USA. MarilynPrasun@insightbb.com

The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
|December 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Rate control for atrial fibrillation (AF) is as effective as rhythm control for mortality. Recent trials like AFFIRM, PIAF, and RACE guide AF treatment strategies, emphasizing anticoagulation management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementing a Mediterranean Diet App in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Perceptions of Educational Needs Among Patients With Ostomies.

Advances in skin & wound care·2026
Same author

Implementing the Consistently Assess Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Guide Into Clinical Practice.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

The Reliability and Validity of Consistently Assess Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure (CLASS-HF) Guide.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Bridging a practice gap in patient education on end-of-life defibrillator management: A quality improvement initiative.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same author

Risk Stratification of Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Journal of emergency nursing·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common dysrhythmia impacting hemodynamics and quality of life.
  • AF involves complex electrical and mechanical remodeling.
  • Rhythm control was the traditional initial treatment for AF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes of rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation.
  • To evaluate the impact of different AF management strategies on mortality, hospitalizations, and adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from recent clinical trials including AFFIRM, PIAF, and RACE.
  • Comparison of mortality rates between rhythm control and rate control groups.
  • Assessment of hospitalizations and medication reactions in AF treatment arms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Rate control demonstrated equivalent mortality outcomes compared to rhythm control for AF.
  • No significant differences in mortality were observed between the two strategies.
  • A trend towards increased hospitalizations and medication reactions was noted in the rhythm-control group, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Rate control is a viable alternative to rhythm control for managing atrial fibrillation, with similar mortality benefits.
  • Anticoagulation remains crucial in AF management but is often inadequately prescribed and monitored.
  • Clinical trial data from AFFIRM, PIAF, and RACE provide essential guidance for optimizing AF treatment strategies.