Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence.

S B Johnson1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida Health Sciences Center, Gainesville.

Diabetes Care
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical Reasoning During a Pandemic: Results of a Five Country European Study.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2022
Same author

COVID-19 contact tracing apps: UK public perceptions.

Critical public health·2022
Same author

Estimating survival in advanced cancer: a comparison of estimates made by oncologists and patients.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2019
Same author

First Report of White Mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) on Soybean in Maine.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Potato mop-top virus on Potato from the United States.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

The 2009 Late Blight Pandemic in the Eastern United States - Causes and Results.

Plant disease·2019
Same journal

A Secular Increase in the Incidence of Islet Autoimmunity Among Colorado Children With Moderate-Risk HLA Genotypes.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

Clinical and Biochemical Recovery From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes With Seroconversion of GAD Antibodies.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

State Insulin Out-of-Pocket Cap Policies and Estimated Eligible Populations in the United States, 2019-2026.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

Genetic Determinants of Macronutrient Intake Are Associated With Specific Food Intake in Youth: A Cohort Study Across Childhood and Adolescence.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

A Novel Electronic Medical Record Search Method to Identify Patients With Ketosis-Prone Diabetes: Implications for Discovery of Atypical Diabetes.

Diabetes care·2026
Same journal

Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among People With Type 2 Diabetes and End-Stage Kidney Failure Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Diabetes care·2026
See all related articles

Nonadherence to diabetes treatment is common and varies widely. Accurately measuring adherence requires careful consideration of conceptual issues and appropriate methods for diverse patient populations.

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Behavioral Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Nonadherence to diabetes treatment regimens is a significant challenge in managing both insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
  • Understanding the prevalence and measurement of adherence is crucial for effective diabetes care.
  • Existing research often overlooks potential differences in adherence between IDDM and NIDDM populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the prevalence of nonadherence in diabetes populations.
  • To examine conceptual and methodological challenges in measuring diabetes regimen adherence.
  • To provide recommendations for future research and clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on diabetes regimen adherence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of conceptual issues including defining adherence standards and patient-provider communication.
  • Evaluation of various measurement methods such as self-reports, provider ratings, and behavioral observations.

    • Main Results:

    • Nonadherence prevalence differs across diabetes regimen components, disease duration, and patient lifespan.
    • Conceptual challenges include lack of clear standards, miscommunication, knowledge deficits, regimen complexity, and confounding with glycemic control.
    • Measurement methods vary in reliability, validity, and sensitivity, necessitating careful selection based on study needs.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate measurement of diabetes adherence is complex and requires robust methodologies.
    • Addressing conceptual and methodological limitations is essential for improving patient outcomes.
    • Future research should focus on standardized measurement and comparative studies between IDDM and NIDDM populations.