Related Experiment Videos
Hypnosis: a sesquicentennial essay.
1Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
|October 1, 1992
Summary
This paper examines the historical and sociopolitical context of hypnosis, from Braid's early work to modern debates. It explores key issues like the definition of hypnosis and the balance between belief and doubt in its study.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Neuroscience
- History of Science
Background:
- Examines James Braid's 1843 "Neurypnology" as a foundational concept in hypnosis.
- Situates Coe's (1992) sociopolitical analysis of hypnosis within this historical context.
- Highlights the evolution of understanding and terminology in the field of hypnosis.
Discussion:
- Analyzes the persistent controversy surrounding the definition and nature of the "hypnotic state."
- Discusses the inherent tension between scientific credulity and skepticism in hypnosis research.
- Explores the complex phenomena of dissociation and automaticity within hypnotic states.
Key Insights:
- The label "hypnosis" itself carries significant historical and sociopolitical weight.
- Understanding hypnosis requires navigating the dichotomy between belief and skepticism.
- Current theoretical conflicts reflect ongoing debates about dissociation and automaticity.
Outlook:
- Investigates the dynamic relationship between clinical practitioners and experimental researchers in hypnosis.
- Suggests future research directions informed by historical and sociopolitical perspectives.
- Emphasizes the need for continued dialogue to resolve theoretical conflicts in hypnosis.