Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

29.8K
Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity.  In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to...
29.8K
Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

3.2K
No description available
3.2K
Mechanical Protein Functions01:58

Mechanical Protein Functions

5.5K
Proteins perform many mechanical functions in a cell. These proteins can be classified into two general categories- proteins that generate mechanical forces and proteins that are subjected to mechanical forces. Proteins providing mechanical support to the structure of the cell, such as keratin, are subjected to mechanical force, whereas proteins involved in cell movement and transport of molecules across cell membranes, such as an ion pump, are examples of generating mechanical force. 
5.5K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Universal and Lineage-Specific Patterns in the Distribution of ECOD Domain Homology Groups Across Superkingdoms.

Proteins·2026
Same author

Family-level specialization in protein domain insertion architectures.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

A taxonomic overview of the <i>Apodemia mormo</i> complex from a genomic perspective.

The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey·2026
Same author

Three butterfly genera across the Central Texas Suture Zone.

The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey·2026
Same author

ECOD: Classification of domains in AFDB Swiss-Prot structure predictions.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Genomic Signatures of Speciation in Butterflies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Generalizing the Gaussian Network Model: Spanning-Tree Thermodynamics Shows Entropy-Driven KRAS Activation.

Proteins·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Identification of Functional Protein Regions Through Chimeric Protein Construction
11:39

Identification of Functional Protein Regions Through Chimeric Protein Construction

Published on: January 8, 2019

10.9K

Effective scoring function for protein sequence design.

Shide Liang1, Nick V Grishin

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390-9050, USA.

Proteins
|December 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We created a new scoring function for protein design that accurately predicts native sequences. This method aids in designing novel protein sequences and identifying related protein families.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.3K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Identification of Functional Protein Regions Through Chimeric Protein Construction
11:39

Identification of Functional Protein Regions Through Chimeric Protein Construction

Published on: January 8, 2019

10.9K
A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.3K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Accurate scoring functions are crucial for successful protein design.
  • Optimizing energy terms and solvation parameters is key to improving prediction accuracy.
  • Current methods may not fully capture the complexities of protein stability and sequence preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an effective scoring function for protein design.
  • To optimize atomic solvation parameters and energy term weights for enhanced native residue prediction.
  • To assess the function's ability to predict mutant stability and design novel protein sequences.

Main Methods:

  • Optimized atomic solvation parameters and energy term weights using a training set of 28 protein structures.
  • Incorporated nonlinear treatment of solvation energy for non-hydrogen-bonded hydrophilic atoms.
  • Validated the scoring function by predicting stability changes for T4 lysozyme mutants and comparing with experimental data.
  • Employed Monte Carlo simulations with the scoring function to predict sequences on a fixed backbone.

Main Results:

  • The scoring function successfully predicted native residues as most favorable at 59% of positions across 28 proteins.
  • High correlation coefficients (0.77 for surface, 0.71 overall) were achieved when predicting T4 lysozyme mutant stability.
  • Designed sequences exhibited similarity to natural sequences within the template structure's family.
  • The designed sequence profiles aided in identifying remote homologues.

Conclusions:

  • The developed scoring function demonstrates high accuracy in predicting native protein sequences and stability.
  • This tool is effective for de novo protein sequence design and can assist in evolutionary relationship discovery.
  • The optimized parameters and methodology offer a robust approach for computational protein design.