Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality.

Thomas Jacobsen1, János Horváth, Erich Schröger

  • 1Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Universität Leipzig, Seeburgstrasse 14-20, Leipzig 04103, Germany. jacobsen@uni-leipzig.de

Brain and Language
|December 31, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Eye movements of younger and older adults decrease during story listening in background noise" [Hearing Research 468 (2025) 109447].

Hearing research·2026
Same author

How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Evidence for temporal-coherence-based segregation of complex auditory scenes in the newborn human brain.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Auditory change detection is influenced by language familiarity, particularly when familiar words are standards. Lexicality of deviant stimuli did not affect change detection processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Auditory sensory memory plays a crucial role in detecting changes in speech sequences.
  • Understanding how language familiarity and lexicality influence auditory change detection is key to comprehending speech processing.
  • The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) component of event-related brain potentials is a sensitive measure of auditory change detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of lexicality and language familiarity on auditory change detection.
  • To examine how the characteristics of standard and deviant stimuli affect change detection processes.
  • To explore the role of pre-attentive, language-specific processes in auditory sequence perception.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-linguistic study using Hungarian and German participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presentation of oddball sequences with language-familiar, language-unfamiliar, lexical, and meaningless stimuli.
  • Recording of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to measure Mismatch Negativity (MMN).

    • Main Results:

    • Language-familiar and language-unfamiliar deviants elicited MMN, indicating change detection.
    • Change detection processes differed based on the familiarity of the standard stimulus.
    • Lexicality of deviant stimuli did not influence change detection.
    • Language-familiar standards were processed differently compared to language-unfamiliar standards.

    Conclusions:

    • Pre-attentive tuning to meaningful words establishes language-specific preparatory processes.
    • These language-specific processes significantly affect auditory change detection in speech sequences.
    • Auditory change detection is modulated by both the familiarity and role (standard vs. deviant) of linguistic stimuli.