Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding the accommodating intraocular lens.

Azhar Rana1, David Miller, Peter Magnante

  • 1Cornea Consultants of Boston, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|January 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Grant et al. Low pH, High Stakes: A Narrative Review Exploring the Acid-Sensing GPR65 Pathway as a Novel Approach in Renal Cell Carcinoma. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3883.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Variations in Perinatal Interventions and Outcomes Among Active-Duty Service Women in the U.S. Military Health System.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2025
Same author

Anger-Related Affect and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association·2025
Same author

Low pH, High Stakes: A Narrative Review Exploring the Acid-Sensing GPR65 Pathway as a Novel Approach in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Cancers·2025
Same author

What Is the Cost Impact of Second Opinions in Oncology? A Retrospective Review.

JCO oncology practice·2025
Same author

From reservoir to rendezvous: the journey of sperm through the oviduct.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2025
Same journal

Light adjustable lens implantation with cataract surgery in eyes with macular pathology.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Use of intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Dehydration and Rehydration Behavior of Ultra-High-Fluence Extracorporeal Cross-Linked Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (ECO-CAIRS).

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Postoperative Vault and Selecting ICL Sizes Using AS-OCT and UBM Images.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Reply: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
See all related articles

A new accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) design using a plus and minus lens doublet offers greater pseudoaccommodation range. This innovative design moves the positive lens forward for enhanced visual function.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optics

Background:

  • Current intraocular lens (IOL) technology aims to restore vision after cataract surgery.
  • Accommodating IOLs seek to mimic the natural eye's ability to change focus.
  • Limitations exist in achieving a wide range of focus with existing accommodating IOL designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) designs.
  • To introduce and evaluate a novel accommodating IOL design.
  • The new design comprises a dual-lens system with positive and negative lens elements.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were employed using a model eye.
  • The pseudoaccommodation range was calculated for various IOL configurations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulations assessed single-lens IOLs and dual-lens (doublet) IOLs.

    • Main Results:

    • A doublet comprising a convex (plus) lens and a concave (minus) lens demonstrated a superior power change range.
    • This dual-lens design outperformed single convex lenses and doublets of two convex lenses.
    • The enhanced range is attributed to the forward movement of the plus lens component.

    Conclusions:

    • An IOL design incorporating positive and negative lenses offers an improved pseudoaccommodation range.
    • Relative movement between the positive and negative lenses is key to achieving greater focus adjustment.
    • This design presents a promising advancement for accommodating intraocular lenses.