Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anthropological facial 'reconstruction--recognizing the fallacies, 'unembracing' the errors, and realizing method

C N Stephan1

  • 1Department of Anatomical Sciences, Bioanthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|January 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Facial approximation methods lack scientific validation despite 200 years of practice. Rigorous scientific testing is crucial to overcome biases and unsubstantiated claims in forensic facial reconstruction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facial soft tissue thicknesses in craniofacial identification: Data collection protocols and associated measurement errors.

Forensic science international·2019
Same author

Mouth width prediction in craniofacial identification: cadaver tests of four recent methods, including two techniques for edentulous skulls.

The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology·2012
Same author

Assessing facial approximation accuracy: how do resemblance ratings of disparate faces compare to recognition tests?

Forensic science international·2006
Same author

Recognition by forensic facial approximation: case specific examples and empirical tests.

Forensic science international·2005
Same author

Position of superciliare in relation to the lateral iris: testing a suggested facial approximation guideline.

Forensic science international·2002
Same author

Medicine may be reducing the human capacity to survive.

Medical hypotheses·2001

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Facial Approximation
  • Soft Tissue Prediction

Background:

  • Facial approximation methods have been used for over 200 years.
  • Current soft tissue prediction methods lack scientific testing and justification.
  • Misleading notions and practitioner biases have become established due to a lack of systematic scientific scrutiny.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for scientific validation of facial approximation techniques.
  • To critically evaluate the current state of facial reconstruction methods.
  • To encourage evidence-based assessment of facial approximation claims.

Main Methods:

  • The study critically reviews the historical development and current practices of facial approximation.
  • It emphasizes the necessity of scientific testing and empirical evidence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The abstract calls for a re-evaluation of the term "facial reconstruction" to reflect its limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • Facial approximation methods are scientifically underdeveloped and rely on unproven techniques.
    • Practitioner biases and marketing ploys contribute to unsubstantiated claims.
    • The effectiveness of facial approximation in generating true positive identifications is questionable.

    Conclusions:

    • Facial approximation methods require rigorous scientific testing and validation.
    • The field is influenced by biases and marketing, leading to exaggerated claims.
    • Forensic practitioners and the public should critically evaluate evidence and avoid "indoctrination" within the field.