Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How the brain processes causal inferences in text.

Robert A Mason1, Marcel Adam Just

  • 1Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. rmason@andrew.cmu.edu

Psychological Science
|January 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural Representations of Death-Related Concepts Identify Conceptual Alteration of Self in Suicidal Youth.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

The neural and cognitive basis of expository text comprehension.

NPJ science of learning·2024
Same author

Retraction Note: Machine learning of neural representations of suicide and emotion concepts identifies suicidal youth.

Nature human behaviour·2023
Same author

Similarities and differences in the neural representations of abstract concepts across English and Mandarin.

Human brain mapping·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: The neuroscience of advanced scientific concepts.

NPJ science of learning·2021
Same author

The neuroscience of advanced scientific concepts.

NPJ science of learning·2021
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals distinct brain networks for text inference generation and integration. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) shows these networks differ from classical language areas, explaining behavioral findings in reading and memory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Theoretical models like construction-integration propose dual processes in text comprehension.
  • Behavioral studies show differing effects of causal relatedness on reading time versus memory.
  • Existing research struggles to link these behavioral patterns to underlying neural mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of causal inference in text processing using fMRI.
  • To determine if inference involves separable components (generation and integration) supported by distinct brain networks.
  • To correlate neural findings with previously observed behavioral patterns in reading and memory.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to scan participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants processed two-sentence passages with varying degrees of causal relatedness.
  • Analysis focused on identifying brain networks associated with inference generation and integration.

    • Main Results:

    • Two distinct large-scale cortical networks were identified: a reasoning system (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and right-hemisphere language areas.
    • These networks were distinguishable from classical left-hemisphere language areas.
    • The identified networks correspond to the dual functional relations observed in behavioral studies of reading time and memory.

    Conclusions:

    • Textual inference processing involves separable generation and integration components.
    • These components are subserved by distinct neural networks involving prefrontal cortex and right-hemisphere language areas.
    • The findings provide a neural explanation for behavioral differences in text comprehension.