Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Normal variation in anorectal manometry.

R L Cali1, G J Blatchford, R E Perry

  • 1Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current controversies in colon and rectal cancer.

Minerva chirurgica·2011
Same author

Risk of bleeding following hemorrhoidal banding in patients on antithrombotic therapy.

Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique·2009
Same author

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and acceptability of phospo-soda buffered saline (Fleet) with sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (Picoprep) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2007
Same author

Oxidative stress potentiates BACE1 gene expression and Abeta generation.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2004
Same author

Familial adenomatous polyposis and extracolonic cancer.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2001
Same author

A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2001
Same journal

Selected Abstracts.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same journal

A Penny for Your Thoughts.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same journal

June 2026 Translations.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same journal

Selected Abstracts.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same journal

Recurrence After Rectopexy: Insights From Magnetic Resonance Defecography.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same journal

Risk of Metabolic Disease After Right- vs Left-Sided Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
See all related articles

This study defined normal anorectal manometry values, finding distinct ranges based on gender and parity. Accurate interpretation requires comparing patients to their specific demographic subgroups.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Physiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Anorectal manometry is crucial for diagnosing defecatory disorders.
  • Establishing precise normal reference ranges is essential for accurate clinical interpretation.
  • Previous studies have not fully delineated normal values across diverse demographic subgroups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normative data for anorectal manometry parameters.
  • To investigate the influence of gender and parity on these parameters.
  • To provide a basis for improved diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Recruitment of 59 healthy volunteers (20 males, 21 nulliparous females, 18 multiparous females).
  • Performance of anorectal manometry using a radial eight-port catheter during resting and squeezing maneuvers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized computerized data analysis and 3D imaging to assess sphincter length, pressures, and vector symmetry index.

    • Main Results:

    • Males exhibited significantly greater resting and squeeze sphincter length compared to females (P < 0.007).
    • Mean maximum squeeze pressures were significantly higher in males (P = 0).
    • Nulliparous females had higher mean maximum resting pressures than multiparous females (P = 0.04), with no difference between males and nulliparous females.

    Conclusions:

    • Normal ranges for anorectal manometry are definable and distinct for subgroups.
    • Gender and parity significantly influence normal manometric values.
    • Clinical interpretation necessitates comparison with appropriate demographic subgroups to identify abnormalities accurately.