Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA.

Daniel A Pollard1, Casey M Bergman, Jens Stoye

  • 1Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. dpollard@socrates.berkeley.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|January 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying predictive hematological biomarkers for radiation exposure by machine learning in mouse models.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

A quantitative proteomics dataset for assessment and prediction of low dose X-ray radiation exposure in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Is Protein Quantification and Physical Normalization Always Necessary in Proteomics?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Closing the Complexity Gap of the Double Distance Problem.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Reconstructing rearrangement phylogenies of natural genomes.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2025
Same author

Horizontal Transfer and Recombination Fuel Ty4 Retrotransposon Evolution in Saccharomyces.

Genome biology and evolution·2025
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Benchmarking genomic sequence alignment tools is crucial. Simulation-based methods effectively evaluate noncoding DNA aligners, revealing tool performance varies with sequence divergence and evolutionary models.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Accurate genomic sequence alignment is essential for biological research.
  • Existing alignment tools lack comprehensive performance characterization for noncoding sequences.
  • Simulation offers a robust method for generating ground truth alignments for noncoding DNA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of eight pairwise sequence alignment tools on simulated noncoding DNA.
  • To evaluate how evolutionary factors like divergence, insertions, deletions, and constrained sequences affect alignment accuracy.
  • To identify optimal tools and strategies for aligning noncoding sequences.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated noncoding DNA alignments using the ROSE platform with Drosophila evolutionary rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated models of point substitution, insertion/deletion, and constrained sequences.
  • Compared simulated "correct" alignments against those generated by eight alignment tools (Avid, BlastZ, Chaos, ClustalW, DiAlign, Lagan, Needle, WABA).

    • Main Results:

    • Alignment accuracy decreases with increasing sequence divergence for all tools.
    • Insertion/deletion events significantly reduce alignment performance.
    • Global aligners showed higher sensitivity across sequences, while local aligners excelled at identifying constrained regions.
    • DiAlign demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for constrained sequences within a specific divergence range.

    Conclusions:

    • For species like Drosophila, selecting an appropriate alignment tool and optimally diverged species pair can yield accurate noncoding sequence alignments.
    • Further research in algorithm development and parameter optimization is needed to maximize information extraction from noncoding DNA alignments.