Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why good guys wear white.

Brian P Meier1, Michael D Robinson, Gerald L Clore

  • 1North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA. brian.p.meier@ndsu.nodak.edu

Psychological Science
|January 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tuning into Experience: Self-Location Flexibility and Experiential Ability.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Trait mindfulness is negatively related to physical health symptoms over time.

Psychology & health·2026
Same author

Where is the self? Relations between head-heart dualism and social judgment.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

In the Beast Mode: Predator Self-Identifications as a Model of Disagreeable Functioning.

Assessment·2026
Same author

Portraits in Misery: A Bottom-Up-to-Prototype Approach to Personality Assessment.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Behavioral Tendencies of Hostility: A New Approach to Personality Assessment Based on Person-in-Context Units.

Journal of research in personality·2025
Same journal

Boosting Media Literacy Using Lateral Reading and Online Search Interventions.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

People automatically associate bright stimuli with positive feelings and dark stimuli with negative feelings. This link between brightness and affect appears to be an obligatory cognitive process, influencing evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Affective Science

Background:

  • Affective experiences are often conceptualized using physical metaphors, such as good being associated with light and bad with dark.
  • Understanding the automaticity of these associations is crucial for explaining human judgment and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the association between stimulus brightness and affect is an optional or obligatory cognitive process.
  • To determine if visual brightness automatically influences affective evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed word valence categorization tasks (positive/negative).
  • Stimulus brightness (light/dark) and word valence were orthogonally manipulated.
  • Reaction times and accuracy were measured to assess processing efficiency.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Categorization performance was significantly inhibited when stimulus brightness mismatched word valence (e.g., bright light with negative words).
  • This interference effect suggests an automatic activation of the brightness-valence association.
  • Boundary conditions for this effect were identified in further studies.

Conclusions:

  • The association between stimulus brightness and affect is not optional but rather an obligatory process.
  • Individuals automatically assume bright things are good and dark things are bad, influencing their evaluations.