Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Artifactual fMRI group and condition differences driven by performance confounds.

K Murphy1, H Garavan

  • 1Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, 2, Dublin, Ireland.

Neuroimage
|January 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remote Working Post-COVID-19: A New Risk Factor for Heart Failure in the Young? Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Ireland from 2017 to 2023.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

The effectiveness of an educational intervention on adolescents' understanding of radiation therapy.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025
Same author

Imaging brain vascular function in Cystic Fibrosis: an MRI study of cerebral blood flow and brain oxygenation.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2025
Same author

Treatment outcomes in sinonasal aspergillosis in dogs in the United Kingdom: 436 cases (2011-2021).

The Journal of small animal practice·2025
Same author

Diagnostic findings in sinonasal aspergillosis in dogs in the United Kingdom: 475 cases (2011-2021).

The Journal of small animal practice·2024
Same author

Reliability and validity testing of the ASSIST functional performance index.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2023
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Ignoring errors in brain imaging analysis can lead to inaccurate results. Functional signals are confounded by errors, causing false positives and negatives in activation maps, necessitating careful error handling in neuroscience research.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Performance variations in group comparisons can confound analysis.
  • Ignoring errors in functional signals can introduce noise or additional confounding signals.
  • Existing brain imaging analysis techniques may not adequately account for error-related processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of ignoring response errors on brain activation maps.
  • To determine if event-related analysis techniques are robust to performance differences.
  • To assess the reliability of functional signals when errors are not properly handled.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalyzed two inhibitory task datasets (young vs. elderly, high vs. low conflict) using event-related techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared analyses that treated correct and error responses separately versus those treating errors as correct.
  • Utilized data simulations to vary the number of errors included in the analyses.
  • Attempted correction using analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with performance as a covariate.

    • Main Results:

    • Activation maps differed considerably when errors were included versus excluded.
    • Excluding errors led to numerous false positive and false negative activation clusters.
    • Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) failed to correct for performance-related differences.
    • Even small numbers of errors significantly altered activation maps in simulations.

    Conclusions:

    • Brain imaging analyses that ignore errors risk misinterpreting activation patterns.
    • Proper accommodation of error contributions is crucial for accurate functional signal interpretation.
    • Neuroscience research must develop and implement methods to account for response errors in data analysis.