Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

WHO disability grading: operational definitions.

J Wim Brandsma1, Wim H Van Brakel

  • 1Green Pastures Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre, PO Box 5, Nepal. Wbrandsma@inf.org.np

Leprosy Review
|January 31, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) disability grading system needs clear operational definitions to ensure accurate early case detection and track patient treatment changes effectively. This study provides these definitions to improve data reliability across global health programs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of Hansen's Disease in Northeast Brazil: A Community-Based Study Integrating Stigma, Empowerment, and Social Distance.

Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH·2026
Same author

Overlap and differences between internalised stigma and depression: A Delphi study.

Global public health·2025
Same author

Pakistan on the road to zero leprosy transmission by 2030.

The Lancet. Global health·2025
Same author

A new guide for basic psychological support for persons affected by neglected tropical diseases: A peer support tool suitable for persons with a diagnosis of leprosy and lymphatic filariasis.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2025
Same author

Cross-cultural adaptation of the 5-Question Stigma Indicators in trachoma-affected communities, Ethiopia.

PLOS mental health·2024
Same author

Self-healing in leprosy: A systematic review.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2024

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Public Health
  • Clinical Assessment

Background:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) disability grading has been a long-standing tool for early case detection and reporting.
  • Its application has expanded to monitoring treatment-induced changes in patient impairments, utilizing a sum score from eyes, hands, and feet (EHF sum score).
  • A significant limitation of the current WHO grading system is the absence of precise operational definitions for its descriptive grades.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the dual utility of the WHO disability grading system: for early case detection and as an indicator of treatment-induced changes in impairments.
  • To address the identified drawback by developing and presenting clear operational definitions for the WHO grading options.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved a critical review of the existing World Health Organization (WHO) disability grading system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The research focused on analyzing the system's application in early case detection and as a measure of change during patient treatment.
  • Operational definitions for the various grading options were developed and are presented within the paper.

    • Main Results:

    • The lack of operational definitions for WHO disability grades can lead to flawed data and inaccurate comparisons across different programs and countries.
    • The development of precise operational definitions is crucial for standardizing the application of the WHO grading system.
    • The paper introduces specific operational definitions for the grading options, aiming to enhance consistency and reliability.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing the proposed operational definitions will improve the accuracy of early case detection using the WHO grading system.
    • Standardized definitions will enhance the reliability of the WHO grading system as an indicator for tracking changes in patient impairments during treatment.
    • Adoption of these definitions is recommended to ensure data integrity and facilitate meaningful cross-program and cross-country comparisons in disability assessment.