Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effective courtroom testimony.

J R Rappeport1

  • 1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.

The Psychiatric Quarterly
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical-legal cases require experts to navigate unique parameters. Thorough preparation, truthful testimony, and admitting uncertainty are key for experts, particularly psychiatrists, in forensic matters.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thirty years and still growing.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1999
Same author

Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1997
Same author

The insanity defense and mental illness.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1992
Same author

Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1989
Same author

Belegaled: mental health and the law in the United States, 1986.

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1987
Same author

Seymour Pollack and the American Board of Forensic Psychiatry.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1985
Same journal

Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Post-Traumatic Growth Among Physicians After the February 6, 2023 Earthquakes in Turkey.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
Same journal

Depression and Anxiety Symptoms and Public Stigma of Receiving Psychological Help: The Mediating Role of Anticipated Stigma at Work among Healthcare Workers.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
Same journal

Negative Mood Regulation Expectancies, Affect and Suicidal Ideation: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
Same journal

Examining the Unidimensional Structure of the Integration of Stressful Life Experiences Scale (ISLES): Psychometric Validation and Mediating Roles of Satisfaction, Resilience, and Religiosity.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
Same journal

Patterns of Short Video Use and Mental Health Among Adolescents: A Latent Profile Analysis.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
Same journal

'Things You Do' and Mental Health in Turkish Adolescents and Adults: Validation of the Turkish Version of Things You Do Questionnaire-15 Item.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Medical-legal situations present distinct challenges compared to standard clinical practice.
  • Experts must adapt to new parameters and legal system intricacies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the essential elements for experts participating in medical-legal proceedings.
  • To provide guidance for psychiatrists navigating forensic evaluations and testimony.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive record review.
  • Interviews with relevant individuals.
  • Pre-trial conferences with legal counsel.
  • Thorough preparation before deposition or testimony.

Main Results:

  • Experts must provide truthful testimony, advocating for their informed opinions, not the retaining party.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Admitting when answers are unknown or new data contradicts prior conclusions is crucial.
  • Strategic pausing, listening, and reflection enhance testimony quality and manage legal objections.

    • Conclusions:

    • Effective participation in the legal system requires understanding its unique demands.
    • Psychiatrists can feel more at ease in forensic matters through diligent preparation and adherence to ethical testimony standards.