Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risks associated with ionizing radiation.

M P Little1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, London, UK. mark.little@imperial.ac.uk

British Medical Bulletin
|February 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-cancer effects of radiation exposure: Cataracts, diseases of the circulatory system, and beyond.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

Machine learning techniques for the prediction of indoor gamma-ray dose rates - Strengths, weaknesses and implications for epidemiology.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2024
Same author

Change in salt intake affects blood pressure of chimpanzees implications for human populations. Circulation 116: 1563-1568, 2007.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2023
Same author

The Evidence for Excess Risk of Cancer and Non-Cancer Disease at Low Doses and Dose Rates.

Radiation research·2022
Same author

THYROID SCREENING AND RELIABILITY OF RADIATION THYROID DOSES FOR THE BELARUSIAN IN UTERO COHORT.

Problemy radiatsiinoi medytsyny ta radiobiolohii·2021
Same author

Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2018
Same journal

Human health in relation to visible, functional, and accessible green space: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Muscle herniae in exercise-induced leg pain: diagnostic pitfalls and the 'repair paradox'.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Scaffolds and platelet concentrates in bone regenerative medicine: applications, mechanisms, and future approaches.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Back squat and deadlift fatiguing protocols elicit distinct countermovement jump profiles: phase-specific predictors and soreness responses.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Enhancing bone healing through osteogenic medium components: biological roles, mechanisms, and clinical applications.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Moral injury in healthcare workers: causes & interventions.

British medical bulletin·2026
See all related articles

This review examines ionizing radiation risks, focusing on cancer from low linear energy transfer radiation. Findings show excess cancer risks in atomic bomb survivors and exposed groups, with higher risks in survivors than medical groups due to cell sterilization.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation biology and toxicology
  • Environmental health and safety
  • Medical physics

Background:

  • Ionizing radiation presents both deterministic and stochastic health risks, including cancer and hereditary diseases.
  • Understanding these risks is crucial for public health and occupational safety.
  • Man-made sources contribute significantly to radiation exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current knowledge on deterministic and stochastic risks of ionizing radiation exposure.
  • To specifically analyze cancer risks from man-made low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation.
  • To compare radiation risk estimates across different exposed populations.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of epidemiological studies on radiation exposure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data from atomic bomb survivors, medically exposed individuals, and occupationally exposed groups.
  • Comparison of relative cancer risks between different populations.

    • Main Results:

    • Excess cancer risks are documented in Japanese atomic bomb survivors and various exposed cohorts.
    • Relative cancer risks are generally higher in atomic bomb survivors compared to medically exposed individuals.
    • Cell sterilization is a key factor explaining risk discrepancies; underlying cancer rates also play a role.
    • Risks in nuclear workforces and miners align with atomic bomb survivor data.

    Conclusions:

    • Ionizing radiation exposure is linked to increased cancer and hereditary disease risks.
    • Population-specific factors, like cell sterilization and baseline cancer rates, influence observed risk magnitudes.
    • Consistent risk patterns emerge between occupationally exposed groups and atomic bomb survivors.