Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cuing effects for informational masking.

Virginia M Richards1, Donna L Neff

  • 1Department of Psychology, 3815 Walnut Street, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. richards@psych.upenn.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 5, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Profile analysis in listeners with normal and elevated audiometric thresholds: Behavioral and modeling results.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Effects of sound segregation cues on multi-sound intensity discrimination.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Speech-Driven Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields Beyond the Auditory Cortex.

Hearing research·2021
Same author

Sub-optimal construction of an auditory profile from temporally distributed spectral information.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020

Adding pretrial cues significantly improves tone detection in complex sound environments. Uncertainty reduction through signal or masker cues can lower detection thresholds by up to 20 dB.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal detection theory

Background:

  • Detecting a target tone within a multitone masker is challenging, especially when masker energy is low at the signal frequency.
  • Uncertainty about the signal or masker characteristics can further impair detection performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effectiveness of pretrial cues in reducing uncertainty and improving tone detection in auditory masking.
  • To compare the benefits of signal cues versus masker cues under different experimental conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved presenting listeners with fixed- and random-frequency signals embedded in multitone maskers.
  • Pretrial cues (signal or masker) were manipulated, along with masker complexity and presentation methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detection thresholds were measured across various cueing conditions and inter-stimulus intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • Cue effectiveness varied individually, with potential threshold reductions up to 20 dB.
    • Comparing masker samples (with or without signal cue) yielded greater benefits than single-interval comparisons.
    • For random-frequency signals, signal or masker cues reduced thresholds compared to no cue, especially with a 50 ms or longer cue-trial interval.

    Conclusions:

    • Pretrial cueing is an effective strategy for improving auditory signal detection in challenging masking conditions.
    • The type of cue (signal vs. masker) and the masker/signal characteristics influence cue effectiveness.
    • Listeners utilize cue information to focus attention on relevant signal frequencies, enhancing detection performance.