Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: current status and future developments.

M M Abu-Serriah1, D A McGowan, K F Moos

  • 1Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Glasgow, UK.

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|February 5, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-sectional survey of a sample of UK primary care dental professionals' experiences of sharps injuries and perception of access to occupational health support.

British dental journal·2018
Same author

Use of safety syringes for administration of local anaesthesia among a sample of UK primary care dental professionals.

British dental journal·2018
Same author

The Flipped Classroom for pre-clinical dental skills teaching - a reflective commentary.

British dental journal·2017
Same author

No longer 'written off' - times have changed for the BBV-infected dental professional.

British dental journal·2017
Same author

Dentists, antibiotics and Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

British dental journal·2015
Same author

Precious heritage.

British dental journal·2014
Same journal

Automated true vertical line determination for orthognathic surgery virtual planning using smartphone photography and open-source applications.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

CAD/CAM-guided total condylar remodelling for the management of active mandibular condylar hyperplasia.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Differential fibular bone mineral density changes following maxillary versus mandibular reconstruction: a cohort study.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Effect of platelet-rich fibrin derivatives on tissue healing and postoperative complications following mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Assessment of temporomandibular joint-related arteries by three-dimensional rotational angiography.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Gender disparities in research trial leadership within oral and maxillofacial surgery.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants (EOECIs) require consistent evaluation. This review discusses osseointegration, success metrics, and infection control for EOECIs to improve clinical assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Implantology

Background:

  • Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants (EOECIs) are utilized in complex craniofacial reconstructions.
  • Standardized assessment of EOECI outcomes is lacking in published literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the existing literature on EOECIs.
  • To discuss key factors influencing EOECI success and management.
  • To advocate for improved objectivity in evaluating clinical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of published clinical experience with EOECIs.
  • Analysis of definitions for osseointegration and success criteria.
  • Discussion of surgical approaches (one- vs. two-stage) and implant design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of peri-abutment infection control strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Variability exists in defining osseointegration and success for EOECIs.
    • Both one- and two-stage placement have reported outcomes.
    • Peri-abutment skin infection remains a significant challenge.
    • Current literature lacks consistent and objective reporting of clinical data.

    Conclusions:

    • A unified approach to defining osseointegration and success is needed for EOECIs.
    • Standardized reporting of clinical outcomes is crucial for advancing the field.
    • Further research should focus on objective assessment and long-term follow-up of EOECIs.