Comparison between a sustained administration of carvedilol versus atenolol to reduce restenosis after coronary

Kwang Soo Cha1, Moo Hyun Kim, Jin Woo Kim

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea. kwangsoo@damc.or.kr

American Heart Journal
|February 5, 2004
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Oral carvedilol did not reduce restenosis after coronary stenting in patients. Further studies on stent-based delivery may be needed to achieve higher local concentrations for effective neointimal inhibition.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Carvedilol inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation.
  • Preclinical studies showed carvedilol suppressed neointimal hyperplasia in a rat model.
  • No data existed on carvedilol's effect on in-stent restenosis in humans.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of sustained oral carvedilol administration in reducing restenosis after coronary stenting.
  • To compare carvedilol with atenolol for preventing in-stent restenosis.

Main Methods:

  • 159 patients were randomized to receive carvedilol (50 mg/d) or atenolol (50 mg/d) before stenting for 3 months.
  • The primary endpoint was angiographic restenosis, defined as >50% diameter stenosis at follow-up.
  • Angiographic follow-up was performed in 86% of patients.

Main Results:

  • Baseline characteristics were similar between groups.
  • Carvedilol was generally well-tolerated, with dose reduction in 3 patients.
  • The restenosis rate was not significantly different between the carvedilol (17.1%) and atenolol (19.4%) groups (P=.732).

Conclusions:

  • Sustained oral carvedilol is ineffective in reducing restenosis after coronary stenting.
  • Further research into stent-based delivery of carvedilol may be warranted to achieve higher local concentrations.
  • Carvedilol's potential for neointimal inhibition warrants investigation with localized delivery methods.