Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responsibility, guilt, and decision under risk.

Francesco Mancini1, Amelia Gangemi

  • 1Scuola di Specializzazione in Psicoterapia Cognitiva, Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva, Rome, Italy. mancini@apc.it

Psychological Reports
|February 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotional Reactions Following Silent Treatment: The Role of Guilt.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Socio-demographic variables among a group of patients with cognitive decline.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Cross-sectional and prospective relations between dysfunctional cognitive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms during late childhood and early adolescence: a test of two aetiological models.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2025
Same author

Mediational Roles of Not Just Right Experiences and Disgust Proneness Between Deontological Guilt and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2025
Same author

Beyond the Scars: An Analysis of Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Interconnections Between Emotion Dysregulation, Dissociation, and Trauma in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Guilt emotion and decision-making under uncertainty.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Moral values, not framing effects, influence risk preferences. Self-perceived guilt leads to risk aversion, while feeling like a victim promotes risk-seeking behavior in decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Decision-making research
  • Moral psychology
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Traditional decision-making models often focus on outcome framing (gains vs. losses).
  • The influence of moral self-perception (guilt vs. victimhood) on risk preferences is less understood.
  • Moral values may override cognitive biases like the framing effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether moral self-perception (guilt or victimhood) influences risk preferences.
  • To determine if moral context is a stronger determinant of choice than outcome framing.
  • To test the hypothesis that self-evaluation as guilty or a victim shapes risk-seeking or risk-averse behavior.

Main Methods:

  • A decision-making task was presented to 232 participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were exposed to four experimental conditions varying story formats (innocence/guilt) and question-option formats (gain/loss).
  • Risk preferences were analyzed based on the condition participants were assigned to.

    • Main Results:

    • The story format, representing moral context (innocence/guilt), significantly impacted participants' risk preferences.
    • Participants in the guilt context exhibited risk-averse behavior.
    • Participants in the innocence context displayed risk-seeking behavior, irrespective of the gain/loss framing.
    • The framing of outcomes as gains or losses did not significantly alter preferences compared to the moral context.

    Conclusions:

    • Moral self-perception is a critical factor in determining risk preferences.
    • The context of guilt or innocence plays a more substantial role in decision-making than the framing of potential outcomes.
    • Understanding individuals' moral self-evaluation is key to predicting their choices in uncertain situations.