Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motor programming as a function of constraints on movement initiation.

B Sidaway1

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, Long Field House, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How close is too close for precise knowledge of results?

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1997
Same author

The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1994
Same author

Coordination changes associated with practice of a soccer kick.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1994
Same author

Hemispheric teaching strategies in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1994
Same author

The interaction of response complexity and instructional set.

Journal of motor behavior·1994
Same author

Ideokinetic imagery as a postural development technique.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1993
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Programming time for movements is significantly influenced by directional accuracy demands, specifically the subtended angle (SA). This accuracy requirement, rather than movement complexity or target size, is the primary factor affecting movement programming time.

Area of Science:

  • Human motor control
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Movement programming is a complex cognitive process.
  • Understanding factors influencing movement programming is crucial for optimizing human performance.
  • Previous research has explored various factors like movement distance and target size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of directional accuracy demand in movement programming time.
  • To quantify the effect of subtended angle (SA) on reaction time and premotor time.
  • To determine if SA is a better predictor of programming time than other movement parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Three simple reaction time experiments were conducted.
  • Participants tapped single or multiple circular targets as quickly as possible.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subtended angle (SA), target size, movement distance, and movement parts were systematically varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Subtended angle (SA) significantly impacted programming time, indexed by reaction time and premotor time.
    • SA was a more potent predictor of programming time than movement parts, target size, or movement distance.
    • Experiment 2 confirmed SA as the primary driver of the directional accuracy effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Directional accuracy demand, quantified by SA, is a critical determinant of movement programming time.
    • Task constraints related to accuracy significantly influence the duration of movement planning.
    • These findings advance our understanding of the cognitive processes underlying motor control.