Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
Published on: December 18, 2016
Why don't medical textbooks teach? The lack of logic in the differential diagnosis
P M J Stuyt1, P F de Vries Robbé, J W M van der Meer
1Department of General Internal Medicine (541), University Medical Centre St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands. p.stuyt@aig.umcn.nl
Abstract:
Medical textbooks are an important aid in the process of diagnosing and treating patients. Medical students use these books to acquire the skills necessary for this process, while medical teachers and experienced doctors use them for teaching these competences. We posed the question whether medical textbooks are structured in such a way that medical students are taught to structure knowledge and to make a differential diagnosis in a logical way. Five major textbooks were compared with regard to four clinical problems (gastrointestinal bleeding, anaemia, oedema and heart failure). The presentation appeared to be very variable in respect of logic and systematic arrangement. In fact, it was disappointing that even in well-reputed textbooks, a systematic approach is lacking. We feel there is a need for improvement, in order to facilitate the learning of medical students and to enhance their abilities in clinical problem solving.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains for...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Differential Staining Technique
Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology l
Introduction to Language of Pathophysiology ll

