Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intraoperative MR imaging.

Sabine Fenchel1, Daniel T Boll, Jonathan S Lewin

  • 1Department of Radiology, University, Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5056, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|February 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual-energy CT for TIPS patency assessment: quantitative iodine measurements and impact on diagnostic performance.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same author

Whole-Body Transformation in Obese Patients Undergoing Metabolic Surgery: Insights From Automated Multiorgan Segmentation.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

Replacing true non-contrast imaging with DECT in GI bleeding demonstrates non-inferior diagnostic performance, reading time and confidence.

European radiology·2025
Same author

Deep Learning-Enhanced Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen at 0.55 T: Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Calculation Interchangeability in Healthy Volunteers.

Academic radiology·2025
Same author

Deep Learning-Enhanced Single Breath-Hold Abdominal MRI at 0.55 T-Technical Feasibility and Image Quality Assessment.

Academic radiology·2025
Same author

TotalSegmentator MRI: Robust Sequence-independent Segmentation of Multiple Anatomic Structures in MRI.

Radiology·2025
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Intraoperative MR imaging enhances neurosurgery by improving navigation and monitoring tumor resections. While beneficial, its cost and appropriate use, especially for high-grade gliomas, require further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Medical Imaging
  • Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Intraoperative MR imaging (iMR) is a revolutionary technology in neurosurgery.
  • It offers benefits such as updating navigation data, monitoring tumor resections, and guiding procedures.
  • iMR helps prevent injury to critical structures and allows early detection of complications like ischemia or hemorrhage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the benefits and limitations of intraoperative MR imaging in neurosurgery.
  • To define the appropriate role of iMR in various neurosurgical procedures.
  • To examine the economic implications of adopting iMR technology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical applications of iMR in neurosurgery.
  • Analysis of iMR's impact on surgical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of iMR with traditional surgical techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • iMR improves accuracy in brain biopsies and assessing tumor resection completeness.
    • Its utility is well-established for low-grade gliomas but remains controversial for high-grade gliomas.
    • While iMR increases initial costs and operating time, it may offer long-term cost reduction by avoiding repeat surgeries or reducing morbidity.

    Conclusions:

    • Intraoperative MR imaging is a valuable tool in neurosurgery, enhancing precision and safety.
    • Careful consideration of its benefits versus costs is necessary for optimal implementation.
    • Further research is needed to fully define the role and cost-effectiveness of iMR in diverse neurosurgical applications.