Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision support system and medical liability.

F A Allaërt1, L Dusserre

  • 1Service d'Informatique Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Hôpital du Bocage, France.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Will applications on smartphones allow a generalization of telemedicine?

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2020
Same author

More Than One In Two Instances Of Venous Thromboembolism (Vte) Treated In French Hospitals Could Have Occurred During The Hospital Stay.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

The "Venous Age": A New Tool To Sensitize Patients To Their Venous Disease.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

[Editorial].

Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique·2016
Same author

Observational study of the effect of substituting NaCl with NaCl+Chitosan 3% (Symbiosal®) in the diet of elderly subjects on their blood pressure values.

Minerva cardioangiologica·2015
Same author

Evaluation of adherence by elderly nursing home patients to regular consumption of apple compote enriched with protein and soluble fiber.

Aging clinical and experimental research·2015
Same journal

Intelligent monitor for an anesthesia breathing circuit.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same journal

Design considerations for intelligent data entry: development of MedIO.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same journal

Medical information retrieval and WWW browsers at Mayo.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same journal

A model of clinical query management that supports integration of biomedical information over the World Wide Web.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same journal

Automated MeSH indexing of the World-Wide Web.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same journal

Teaching literature searching in the context of the World Wide Web.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
See all related articles

Expert systems in medicine are advancing, raising questions about professional liability. This study examines the legal responsibilities of those building and using these systems, emphasizing physician oversight.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Computer Science
  • Law

Background:

  • Expert systems are increasingly sophisticated tools in medicine.
  • Their growing use necessitates understanding associated professional liabilities.
  • Current systems require careful consideration of their role as support tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey the configuration and operation of medical expert systems.
  • To analyze the liabilities of individuals involved in creating and utilizing these systems.
  • To discuss legal responsibilities concerning various system dysfunctions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of expert system configurations and functionalities.
  • Analysis of legal precedents and ethical considerations in medical technology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study approach to various potential system dysfunctions.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians remain ultimately responsible, as expert systems are support tools.
    • Developers and other involved professionals may share liability for system failures.
    • The burden of proof in cases of dysfunction is examined.

    Conclusions:

    • Expert systems should augment, not replace, clinical judgment.
    • Clear guidelines are needed to define liability in the use of medical AI.
    • Internal system re-computation can aid in verifying data and outcomes.