Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Judicial murder.

J M Tamm

    Medicine and Law
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Judicial errors leading to the death penalty are catastrophic. Unbiased intervention is crucial to prevent systemic injustices and deadly organizational mistakes stemming from psychological influences and flawed deductions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Materialism and spiritualism: the dualistic way of Western thinking.

    Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·1979
    Same journal

    CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

    Medicine and law·2019
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Legal Studies
    • Psychology
    • Sociology

    Background:

    • Judicial errors, particularly those resulting in the death penalty, pose a catastrophic risk to justice.
    • Existing appellate systems mitigate but do not eliminate the risk of condemning innocent individuals.
    • Psychological influences and preconceived notions can detrimentally affect judicial decision-making, as exemplified by historical cases.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the systemic risks of judicial error in capital punishment cases.
    • To explore the parallels between psychological dynamics in family systems and judicial decision-making.
    • To advocate for the necessity of unbiased external intervention in complex systems to prevent catastrophic errors.

    Main Methods:

    • Case study analysis of historical judicial errors (e.g., Socrates).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analogy drawn from psychosomatic medicine regarding family dynamics and aggression.
  • Conceptual analysis of systemic flaws and the role of bias.

    • Main Results:

    • Psychological factors and flawed reasoning, akin to those in family disputes, can infiltrate judicial processes.
    • The absence of unbiased oversight can lead to severe and irreversible injustices.
    • Appeals courts, while reducing risk, do not guarantee the prevention of wrongful convictions.

    Conclusions:

    • The risk of judicial error, especially in capital cases, necessitates robust safeguards beyond standard appeals.
    • Unbiased external review is essential to counteract inherent systemic biases and psychological influences.
    • Preventing catastrophic organizational mistakes requires acknowledging and addressing the potential for deeply ingrained errors.