Related Experiment Videos
Language samples using three story elicitation tasks and maturation effects
M J Morris-Friehe1, D D Sanger
1Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Journal of Communication Disorders
|April 1, 1992
Summary
This study examined spoken language skills in elementary students with learning disabilities (LD). Story generation tasks revealed differences in performance and errors over one year, impacting language sampling methods.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Linguistics
- Special Education
Background:
- Children with learning disabilities (LD) often exhibit challenges in spoken language development.
- Storytelling is a complex linguistic task that can reveal subtle language deficits.
- Understanding the impact of different story elicitation methods is crucial for accurate language assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the spoken language performance of elementary students with LD across three distinct story generation tasks.
- To analyze changes in discourse variables over a one-year period in students with LD.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different story-elicitation methods for language sampling in this population.
Main Methods:
- Twenty elementary students with verified learning disabilities participated.
- Spoken language skills were assessed using a discourse analysis procedure applied to story retellings.
- Three story tasks were employed: picture-based, memory-based, and game-based story generation, assessed over one year.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant main effects were found for task on 9 out of 17 discourse variables.
- A significant main effect for time was observed, indicating changes over the one-year period.
- Stories generated from memory were longer but contained more and varied errors compared to picture or game-based stories.
Conclusions:
- The type of story generation task significantly influences the discourse produced by students with LD.
- Memory-based story generation may elicit more linguistic output but also highlights more error patterns.
- Findings have implications for selecting appropriate story tasks in language sampling for students with learning disabilities.