Related Experiment Videos
Follow-up of children at risk for language problems
1Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0731.
Journal of Communication Disorders
|September 1, 1994
Summary
Children at risk for language problems often improve, but some continue to need speech-language pathologist (SLP) support. Early identification is key for effective language development intervention.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Longitudinal studies are crucial for understanding the long-term trajectory of language development in at-risk children.
- Previous identification of at-risk status for language problems necessitates follow-up to assess outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the long-term language, academic, and cognitive outcomes of students identified as at-risk for language problems.
- To compare outcomes between students who received speech-language pathologist (SLP) services and those who did not.
- To identify characteristics differentiating students who continued to exhibit language impairments (LI) from those who did not.
Main Methods:
- Follow-up assessment of 19 students (ages 10-14) previously identified as at-risk for language problems.
- Utilized standardized and informal measures to evaluate cognitive, academic, and linguistic skills.
- Analyzed data for the total group and two subgroups: language impaired (LI) and contrast (CG).
Main Results:
- 37% of students initially at-risk were unidentified with language impairments at follow-up without SLP services.
- Students in the LI subgroup showed lower receptive and composite language scores (CELF-R, TLC-E) compared to the CG.
- Teachers and parents reported more communication and social skill concerns for the LI group.
Conclusions:
- A significant portion of children identified as at-risk for language problems may not require ongoing intervention, but a substantial number continue to exhibit difficulties.
- Receptive language skills and teacher/parent-reported communication behaviors are important indicators for identifying persistent language impairments.
- Further research on identifying and supporting at-risk populations is warranted.