Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dental implants and decision making.

G A Zarb1, D W Lewis

  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Dental Education
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social status and energy intake: a randomized controlled experiment.

Clinical obesity·2017
Same author

Inconsistencies and inaccuracies in reporting on choice of endpoints and of statistical results in RCT of maternal diet.

Pediatric obesity·2015
Same author

The replacement of missing teeth.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Deficiency in myosin light-chain phosphorylation causes cytokinesis failure and multipolarity in cancer cells.

Oncogene·2010
Same author

Atomoxetine treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid tic disorders.

Neurology·2005
Same author

Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2003
Same journal

Redefining Graduation Competency for Clinical Skills Assessment: A Conceptual Proposal Originating From Periodontal Education.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Entrustment and Practice Readiness: Learner Experiences With Implementing Longitudinal Assessment Using Entrustable Professional Activities.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Smile beyond Borders: Gender, Academic Level, and Contextual Cross-Cultural Smile Self-Perception among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Impact of AI-Generated Feedback on Dental Student Performance in Preclinical Prosthodontics Education.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

An Exploratory Comparative Analysis of Mixed Reality Simulation Versus 3D-Printed Models for Undergraduate Training in Third Molar Removal.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Preparing for Evolving Roles: Variation in Dental Hygiene and Therapy Practice.

Journal of dental education·2026
See all related articles

This study compares implant prosthodontics with traditional therapies for tooth replacement. It aims to establish criteria for optimal functional and aesthetic restoration with minimal risk and cost.

Area of Science:

  • Prosthodontics
  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Traditional prosthodontic treatment relies heavily on clinical experience and anecdotal evidence.
  • The biologic cost and clinical decision-making complexities of prosthetic interventions necessitate rigorous evaluation.
  • Osseointegration in implant prosthodontics, introduced in 1982, has generated significant clinical interest and debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare implant prosthodontics with traditional therapies.
  • To define criteria for optimal functional and aesthetic dental restoration.
  • To identify factors influencing morbidity and cost in prosthetic treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical trials and exemplary reports on osseointegration techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of implant prosthodontics versus conventional dental treatments.
  • Evaluation of functional, aesthetic, morbidity, and cost parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • The osseointegration technique has advanced significantly over the past decade.
    • Clinical research and opinion highlight both the potential and polarization surrounding implant prosthodontics.
    • A need exists to compare implant merits against traditional methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Establishing criteria for optimal prosthetic restoration is crucial.
    • Balancing functional, aesthetic, and biologic considerations is key in treatment planning.
    • Further systematic evaluation is required to guide clinical decision-making in prosthodontics.