Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

AAEM minimonograph #39: digital filtering: basic concepts and application to evoked potentials.

P J Maccabee1, N F Hassan

  • 1Department of Neurology, State University of New York, Brooklyn.

Muscle & Nerve
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigation of Hematological and Biochemical Effects of Feeding Date in the Early Morning on Empty Stomach vs. after Nutrition on Rabbits.

Archives of Razi Institute·2022
Same author

Transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference·2007
Same author

Is cerebral involvement an occasional feature of muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive syndrome?

European journal of neurology·2007
Same author

Interconnections between cortical areas revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement·2000
Same author

Remote village survey for agents causing hepatosplenic disease in the Republic of Yemen.

Tropical doctor·1999
Same author

Cerebral function revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Journal of neuroscience methods·1999

Digital and analog filtering methods for evoked potentials have limitations. Digital filtering, while avoiding phase distortion, may reveal artifactual components requiring comparison with open bandpass recordings for accurate interpretation of neurophysiological signals.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Evoked potentials are crucial for assessing neural pathway integrity.
  • Clinical filtering of evoked potentials uses analog and digital techniques.
  • Analog filtering can introduce significant nonlinear phase distortion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of analog and digital filtering on evoked potential analysis.
  • To compare the fidelity of evoked potential components obtained via different filtering methods.
  • To establish best practices for filtering evoked potentials in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of analog filtering artifacts, specifically nonlinear phase shift.
  • Application of digital filtering techniques, including zero phase shift filters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of evoked potential components from restricted bandpass and open bandpass digital filters.
  • Investigation of high-pass filtering for differentiating synaptic and axonal activities in somatosensory-evoked potentials.

    • Main Results:

    • Analog filtering introduces potentially severe nonlinear phase distortion.
    • Digital filtering avoids phase shift distortion but may yield components not linked to specific neural generators.
    • Comparing zero phase shift filtered components with open bandpass recordings is essential.
    • High-pass filtering can differentiate slow synaptic activity from faster axonal conduction.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital filtering offers advantages over analog methods by eliminating phase distortion.
    • Careful interpretation and comparative analysis are necessary when using digital filters to avoid misattributing components.
    • Specific filtering strategies, like high-pass, can aid in dissecting neural signal origins.