Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Doppler microembolic signals during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two membrane oxygenators
Dimitrios Georgiadis1, Rüdiger Stets, Alexander Schorch
1Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany. Dimitrios.Georgiadis@nos.usz.ch
Abstract:
We undertook this study to evaluate the dependence of Doppler microembolic signal (MES) counts, detected during cardiopulmonary bypass, on the type of oxygenator used. A total of 90 patients, 71 men and 19 women, aged 60 +/- 10 years (mean +/- SD), undergoing elective cardiac surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting (one vessel, n = 6; two vessels, n = 24; three vessels, n = 33; four vessels, n = 9) or valve replacement (mitral valve, n = 2, aortic valve, n = 15, both valves, n = 1) were monitored with transcranial Doppler sonography during the complete surgical procedure. The surgical and anesthetic techniques were standardized in all patients, except for the type of membrane oxygenator used (COBE CML Duo, n = 55 or DIDECO D 703, n = 35). MES count was expressed as total number of MES detected in both middle cerebral arteries during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and also as total MES number divided by the CPB duration in minutes (MES min(-1)). No significant differences in patients' age or sex and type and duration of operation were noted between the two groups. MES incidence while the patients were on cardiopulmonary bypass was 100%. MES counts during CPB were 309 (236-502) and 143 (86-233) for DIDECO and COBE oxygenators, respectively (p < 0.00001). MES min(-1) were also significantly higher in patients operated with DIDECO, as compared to COBE oxygenators (3.7 (2.4-5.6) versus 1.5 (1-2.4), respectively, p < 0.0001). Inter-observer variability was satisfactory (k = 0.72). Use of a DIDECO D 703 oxygenator resulted in significantly higher MES counts as compared to the COBE CML Duo oxygenator. The clinical relevance of this finding remains to be determined.
More Related Videos
03:40Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024