Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
[Statistical approaches to evaluate agreement]
Josep Lluís Carrasco1, Lluís Jover
1Bioestadística, Departamento de Salud Pública, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.carrasco@medicina.ub.es
Abstract:
Reliability and agreement of measurement methods is a fundamental issue in health sciences which is not usually borne in mind. In this document the connotations of using measurement methods with error and the switchability among measurements from methods which disagree are highlighted. These implications are illustrated through examples showing up the confounding effect that measurement error can produce. Throughout the document several procedures to assess agreement and to identify the error sources are suggested. These procedures are classified according to the sort of data, quantitative or qualitative data, as well as the way of agreement is assessed, in an aggregate way by means a values or in a disaggregate way analysing separately the error sources. By means of these procedures is showed that frequently used approaches to assess agreement as the averages comparison, the correlation coefficient or the regression model appear as insufficient or inadequate approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Statistical Significance