Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of stated preference methods for estimating monetary values.

Mandy Ryan1

  • 1Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Scotland. m.ryan@abdn.ac.uk

Health Economics
|February 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases worth its cost? A user-based approach to valuation.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Beyond the Diagnosis: Valuing Genome-Wide Sequencing for Rare Disease Diagnosis Using Contingent Valuation.

Applied health economics and health policy·2025
Same author

Is time a gift for health and life satisfaction? Exploring the relationship between time allocation and adaptation to a breast cancer diagnosis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

Patient Preferences for HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment.

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Impact of patient sex on selection for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a discrete choice experiment.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Stakeholder prioritization preferences for individuals awaiting hip and knee arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2024
Same journal

Health on the Move: The Impact of Poverty Alleviation Relocation on Healthcare Utilization in China.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Compulsory Licensing: A Case Study of HIV Drugs.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Tobacco Prevention: The Effects of Tobacco 21 Laws on Young Adults' Body Weight.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Do Patients Value the Service Provided by Physicians Who Overbill? A Willingness-to-Pay Study Using French Survey Data.

Health economics·2026
See all related articles

This study compared willingness to pay (WTP) using two methods for individuals undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Both methods yielded similar welfare estimates, questioning the distinct validity of each approach.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Environmental Economics
  • Reproductive Medicine

Background:

  • Contingent valuation (CV) is frequently used to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for non-market goods and services.
  • Dichotomous choice (DC) and choice experiment (CE) are two common CV methods.
  • Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) involve significant costs and ethical considerations, making WTP estimation relevant.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare willingness to pay (WTP) estimates derived from a dichotomous choice (DC) contingent valuation experiment and a choice experiment (CE).
  • To assess the validity and consistency of different WTP estimation approaches within the context of assisted reproductive techniques.
  • To explore the implications of WTP findings for healthcare policy and resource allocation in reproductive medicine.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A comparative study design was employed, involving subjects undergoing assisted reproductive techniques in Scotland.
  • Participants completed a dichotomous choice (DC) contingent valuation questionnaire.
  • A subset of participants subsequently completed a choice experiment (CE) questionnaire two months later.

Main Results:

  • Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates from the dichotomous choice (DC) contingent valuation and choice experiment (CE) methods were not statistically different.
  • The findings suggest a convergence of welfare estimates between the two WTP valuation techniques.
  • No significant variation in WTP was observed between the DC and CE approaches for the study population.

Conclusions:

  • The study raises important questions regarding the convergent validity of dichotomous choice (DC) and choice experiment (CE) methods for estimating willingness to pay (WTP).
  • The findings imply that different contingent valuation approaches may yield comparable welfare estimates in this specific healthcare context.
  • Further research is warranted to fully understand the nuances and applicability of various WTP estimation techniques in health economics.