Surveillance for retinopathy of prematurity in a Danish country. Epidemiological experience over 20 years

Hans C Fledelius1, Birgit Kjer

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. rh03217@rh.dk

Insights

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) rates increased significantly in a Danish county, interrupting a previous downward trend. Despite this, lower screening limits for gestational age and birthweight may now be appropriate.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal ophthalmology
  • Public health surveillance
  • Pediatric epidemiology

Background:

  • Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a significant cause of visual impairment in premature infants.
  • Monitoring ROP trends is crucial for assessing neonatal care quality.
  • Previous studies in this Danish county showed a continuous improvement in ROP outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze updated trends in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in a Danish county from 1982 to 2001.
  • To evaluate changes in ROP frequency, severity, and risk factors over time.
  • To inform potential adjustments to ROP screening guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective surveillance of 132 infants born between 1998-2001 for ROP.
  • Comparison with data from 1123 infants in five previous reports (1982-1997).
  • Analysis focused on high-risk infants (gestational age/birthweight below national screening limits).

Main Results:

  • The trend of continuous improvement in ROP outcomes was interrupted between 1998-2001.
  • ROP incidence increased from 10% to 31% in high-risk infants compared to the prior period.
  • Four cases required retinal ablation therapy, a significant increase from zero in the preceding period; however, no advanced ROP occurred in infants >30 weeks GA / 1500g BW.

Conclusions:

  • The recent worsening trend in ROP necessitates attentive monitoring as a neonatal quality indicator.
  • Despite the observed increase, a reduction in ophthalmic screening limits for gestational age and birthweight appears justifiable.
  • Consideration should be given to lowering screening limits to 31 weeks gestational age and 1500g birthweight, informed by local and national data.
Abstract