Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations.

Mark G Frank1, Paul Ekman

  • 1School of Communication, Information, and Library Studies, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. mgfrank@scils.rutgers.edu

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|March 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The rise of affectivism.

Nature human behaviour·2021
Same author

Emotion and aggressive intergroup cognitions: The ANCODI hypothesis.

Aggressive behavior·2016
Same author

What Scientists Who Study Emotion Agree About.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2016
Same author

Inside the Psychologist's Studio.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2015
Same author

Emotional vocalizations are recognized across cultures regardless of the valence of distractors.

Psychological science·2015
Same author

Anticipatory sensitization to repeated stressors: the role of initial cortisol reactivity and meditation/emotion skills training.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2014

People consistently appear truthful across different deception scenarios. Observers

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • The ability to appear truthful is crucial in social interactions.
  • Deception situations present unique challenges for assessing truthfulness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the ability to appear truthful is specific to deception situations.
  • To determine if individuals maintain a consistent truthful appearance across different high-stakes deception scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Male participants engaged in two high-stake deception situations: a mock crime and a false opinion.
  • Videotaped interrogations were presented to independent groups of undergraduate observers for truthfulness judgments.
  • Physiognomy judgments were also collected.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A high correlation was found between observers' truthfulness judgments across the two deception situations.
  • This consistency in perceived truthfulness was not correlated with physiognomy judgments.
  • Follow-up studies indicated that observers' judgments were primarily influenced by the consistency of dynamic facial behaviors.

Conclusions:

  • The ability to appear truthful is not specific to a single deception situation but is consistent across different scenarios.
  • Dynamic facial behaviors play a significant role in observers' perceptions of truthfulness.
  • These findings highlight the evolutionary importance of facial cues in communication and deception detection.