Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Radiographic parameters as prognostic indicators for healing of class II furcation defects
Jacob Horwitz1, Eli E Machtei, Peter Reitmeir
1Periodontal Unit, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa 31096, Israel.
Objective:
To evaluate radiographic measurements for use as prognostic indicators for healing of class II furcation defects following regenerative therapy.
Material And Methods:
In 17 patients (eight females), 33 class II furcation defects (mandibular buccal (n=10) and lingual (n=12), and maxillary buccal (n=11)) were treated using the barrier membrane technique. Twenty-six furcations were treated using a bioabsorbable membrane, while a nonresorbable membrane was used to treat the remaining seven furcation defects. Clinical parameters and standardized radiographs were obtained before as well as 6 and 24 months after therapy. All radiographs were digitized and evaluated by an examiner blinded to the clinical data. The following distances were measured: cemento-enamel junction line (CEJ-line) to alveolar crest (AC) at the furcation site (AC-CEJ line), CEJ-line to the furcation fornix (Fx-CEJ line), width of the furcation at the level of the AC (FW) as well as the distance from Fx to a straight line between the AC mesial and distal of the tooth (Fx-AC line).
Results:
Statistically significant (p<0.001) horizontal attachment gains could be observed 6 and 24 months after therapy (6 months: 1.49+/-0.85 mm; 24 months: 1.14+/-0.91 mm). However, a small but statistically significant (p=0.031) attachment loss of 0.35 mm was observed between the 6 and 24 months examination. Multilevel regression analyses identified baseline probing depth (p=0.0017) and 3 of the radiographic distances as prognostic factors: Fx-CEJ line (p=0.014), FW (p=0.0535), Fx-AC line (p=0.0827).
Conclusion:
The analysis of presurgical radiographs may yield information on the success of the regenerative therapy of buccal and lingual class II furcation defects. A long root trunk, a wide furcation entrance and an Fx coronal to the AC have negative influences on the success of therapy. Further, a deep probing depth at the furcation site at baseline increases the likelihood for more favourable horizontal attachment gain in furcations.