Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

04:36
Implantation Protocol of the Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body for Complex Vitreoretinal Surgery
Published on: April 14, 2026
Implant Failure Rate in Transcrestal and Lateral Window Sinus Augmentations: A Descriptive Retrospective Cohort Study
Eran Gabay1,2, Yuval Shafran2, Tarek Mtanis1
1Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Hashniya 8, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Dentistry Journal
|July 27, 2026
Summary
Dental implant survival rates were higher with the Lateral Window (LW) technique compared to the Transcrestal (TC) approach. Smoking and shorter implant length were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Dental Implantology
- Regenerative Dentistry
Background:
- Maxillary sinus augmentation is crucial for dental implant placement in atrophic maxillae.
- Comparing the efficacy of Lateral Window (LW) and Transcrestal (TC) sinus augmentation techniques is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare implant survival rates between LW and TC sinus augmentation techniques.
- To identify risk factors associated with implant failure following these procedures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort analysis of 135 patients undergoing maxillary sinus augmentation and implant placement (2015-2019).
- Data collected included surgical approach (LW vs. TC), graft materials, implant characteristics, and clinical outcomes.
- Statistical analysis to determine implant survival rates and associated risk factors.
Main Results:
- Overall implant failure rate was 7.7%, with higher rates in the TC group (11.11%) than the LW group (2.22%).
- Shorter implant length (8mm) and smoking were significant predictors of implant failure.
- Smoking also negatively impacted graft survival.
Conclusions:
- The Lateral Window technique demonstrated higher implant survival rates than the Transcrestal technique in this cohort.
- Smoking and shorter implant length are significant risk factors for implant failure.
- Potential confounding by indication necessitates cautious interpretation of technique-specific survival rates.
