Related Experiment Videos
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems
Andre W Kushniruk1, Vimla L Patel
1Information Technology Division, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Canada. andrek@mathstat.yorku.ca
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
|March 16, 2004
Summary
Evaluating health information systems requires robust methods. This study details usability engineering and cognitive science approaches for assessing human-computer interaction in healthcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Usability Engineering
Background:
- Healthcare decision-makers increasingly demand evidence for health information system (HIS) investments.
- Evaluating HIS impact necessitates diverse methodologies, from clinical trials to user feedback.
- Existing evaluation methods may not fully capture the complexities of HIS in practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a decade-long refinement of methodological approaches for evaluating health information systems.
- To emphasize the integration of cognitive science and usability engineering principles in HIS evaluation.
- To detail practical methods for assessing human-computer interaction and system usability.
Main Methods:
- Application of cognitive science theories and usability engineering methods.
- Usability testing and inspection in both laboratory and naturalistic settings.
- Cognitive task analysis for understanding user interactions with HIS.
Main Results:
- Developed and refined practical methods for evaluating HIS usability over 10 years.
- Demonstrated the value of usability engineering for formative and summative HIS evaluation.
- Highlighted the importance of human-computer interaction assessment in healthcare.
Conclusions:
- Usability engineering and cognitive science offer powerful frameworks for evaluating health information systems.
- These methods enhance the assessment of HIS, particularly human-computer interaction.
- The described approaches complement traditional evaluation techniques for comprehensive HIS assessment.