Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conceiving the past and future.

Ian R Newby-Clark1, Michael Ross

  • 1University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. newby-clark@psy.uoguelph.ca

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|March 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HIV, nephrotoxic medications, and chronic kidney disease: Prevalence, risk factors, and mediation analyses among people with and without HIV enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)/ Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) combined cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Results from an international multi-center prospective registry of cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous cardiac interventions guided with three-dimensional imaging.

Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology·2026
Same author

The Diabetes Education Arena: Results of the 2025 ADCES National Practice Survey of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists.

The science of diabetes self-management and care·2026
Same author

HIV, Nephrotoxic Medications, and Chronic Kidney Disease: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Mediation Analyses Among People With and Without HIV Enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) / Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) Combined Cohort Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Fires enhanced productivity in fire-adapted subtropical pinelands of the Florida Everglades.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Evaluating tree biomass estimation in trans-Atlantic mangrove species: Comparing bole diameter measurements for improved accuracy.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Metacognitive and Interpersonal Intellectual Humility Are Asymmetrically Associated with Well-Being.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Intergroup Contact and Belonging Among Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Taxonomy of Data Synthesis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Prospects of Downward Mobility Cause Status Anxiety and Life Dissatisfaction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Fluency as a Cue to Authenticity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
See all related articles

People tend to remember a mixed past but imagine an ideal future. They also take longer to think about negative future events than positive ones, indicating less cognitive effort is devoted to them.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Human perception of time and personal events is crucial for decision-making and well-being.
  • Understanding temporal biases can illuminate psychological mechanisms underlying optimism and planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether people's recall of past personal events differs from their anticipation of future personal events.
  • To examine the cognitive processes underlying the anticipation of positive versus negative future events.

Main Methods:

  • Participants recalled and anticipated personally significant positive and negative life episodes.
  • Response latencies were measured for generating and judging the likelihood of past and future events.
  • Studies involved comparing recall speed for affectively valenced past and future events.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Individuals spontaneously recall a past with mixed positive and negative events.
  • Anticipation of future events is biased towards homogeneously positive and ideal scenarios.
  • Participants were significantly slower to generate and deem negative future events as likely compared to positive future events.
  • Recall speed for past events was not affected by their affective valence.

Conclusions:

  • A temporal asymmetry exists in how people mentally represent their past and future.
  • Cognitive effort is disproportionately allocated to positive future anticipation, potentially neglecting negative future possibilities.
  • This bias may have implications for risk assessment, planning, and emotional regulation.