Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access?

Timothy C Rickard1, Daniel Bajic

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. trickard@ucsd.edu

Cognitive Psychology
|March 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spaced practice and reactive inhibition have limited or no effects on motor sequence learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Semantic relatedness and the efficacy of retrieval practice.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

The effects of declarative learning on early and late motor skill learning.

NPJ science of learning·2025
Same author

Comparison of online, offline, and hybrid hypotheses of motor sequence learning using a quantitative model that incorporate reactive inhibition.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Dissipation of reactive inhibition is sufficient to explain post-rest improvements in motor sequence learning.

NPJ science of learning·2022
Same author

Age does not modify the processing architecture of dual memory retrieval: an investigation of age-related effects on dual-retrieval practice in younger and older adults.

Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition·2022
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Memory retrieval may not always be parallel. While dual cues can speed up response times after practice, this effect depends on forming a "chunked" representation, suggesting a bottleneck before retrieval.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • The ability to retrieve memories using multiple cues simultaneously remains a key unresolved question in memory research.
  • Existing theories and empirical data offer conflicting perspectives on whether memory retrieval operates in parallel or serially.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether multiple independent cues can be concurrently utilized for recalling a single memory response.
  • To develop and test quantitative models examining principles of parallel versus serial memory retrieval.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects learned to associate vocal digit responses with letter or color cues.
  • Experiments involved single-cue and dual-cue trials, where dual cues consistently required the same response.
  • Reaction time (RT) distributions were analyzed to detect evidence of parallel processing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Initially, no evidence of parallel retrieval was observed with dual cues.
  • After repeated exposure, dual-cue trials became faster than single-cue trials, but only when a "chunked" dual-cue representation could form.
  • Associative independence was identified as a critical factor influencing retrieval efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Parallel memory retrieval is not always possible and is modulated by factors like associative independence.
  • The findings suggest that the performance bottleneck in memory retrieval likely occurs before the retrieval stage itself.
  • Results support models where processing limitations precede the actual recall mechanism.