Optimal designs for linkage disequilibrium mapping and candidate gene association tests in livestock populations

Simulation was used to evaluate the performance of different selective genotyping strategies when using linkage disequilibrium across large half-sib families to position a QTL within a previously defined genomic region. Strategies examined included standard selective genotyping and different approaches of discordant and concordant sib selection applied to arbitrary or selected families. Strategies were compared as a function of effect and frequency of QTL alleles, heritability, and phenotypic expression of the trait. Large half-sib families were simulated for 100 generations and 2% of the population was genotyped in the final generation. Simple ANOVA was applied and the marker with the greatest F-value was considered the most likely QTL position. For traits with continuous phenotypes, genotyping the most divergent pairs of half-sibs from all families was the best strategy in general, but standard selective genotyping was somewhat more precise when heritability was low. When the phenotype was distributed in ordered categories, discordant sib selection was the optimal approach for positioning QTL for traits with high heritability and concordant sib selection was the best approach when genetic effects were small. Genotyping of a few selected sibs from many families was generally more efficient than genotyping many individuals from a few highly selected sires.