Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

U Müller1, C Roeder, L Dubs

  • 1Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, P.O. Box 8354, 3001 Bern, Switzerland. umueller@memced.org

European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
|March 19, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of costs associated with fertility treatment leading to a live birth after one fresh transfer: A global perspective.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2023
Same author

Circulating APRIL levels are correlated with advanced disease and prognosis in rectal cancer patients.

Oncogenesis·2015
Same author

In vivo compatibility of Dynesys(®) spinal implants: a case series of five retrieved periprosthetic tissue samples and corresponding implants.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2014
Same author

[Influencing factors on the length of stay in lumbar spine surgery : analysis of the German spine registry].

Der Orthopade·2014
Same author

Debate: This Society believes that in the last 25 years of back pain research we have failed to see the wood for the trees - Chaired by C.G. Greenough.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

[LiLa classification for paediatric long bone fractures. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability].

Der Unfallchirurg·2013

This review analyzes low back pain questionnaires, focusing on question content and scoring to improve construct validity. It provides suggestions for enhancing the practical application of these self-administered assessment tools.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Health Outcomes Research
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders

Background:

  • Low back pain is a prevalent condition requiring effective assessment tools.
  • Numerous self-administered questionnaires exist for evaluating low back pain.
  • Part I of this review analyzed technical aspects of nine widely used questionnaires.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the content and wording of questions and answers in nine leading low back pain questionnaires.
  • To analyze scoring methods and identify potential score bias.
  • To provide recommendations for improving the construct validity of these tools in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on condition-specific, self-administered low back pain assessment tools.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of questionnaire content, question/answer wording, and scoring methodologies.
  • Evaluation of score bias and construct validity in practical application.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variation exists in the content and wording of questions across the nine reviewed questionnaires.
    • Different scoring methods can lead to variability in results and potential score bias.
    • The analysis identified areas for improvement in questionnaire design and interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • The content and scoring of low back pain questionnaires significantly impact their construct validity.
    • Careful consideration of question wording and scoring is essential for accurate patient assessment.
    • Recommendations are provided to enhance the clinical utility and validity of these widely used tools.