Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Masking redux. II: A recommended masking protocol.

Robert G Turner1

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1900 Gravier St, Box G6-2, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. rturne@lsuhsc.edu

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|March 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an optimized masking method for audiology, proving faster than traditional techniques. A combined protocol ensures valid threshold measures in all audiological testing situations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Hearing Aid Expert: Audiologist, Dealer, or Otolaryngologist?

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Understanding protocol performance: impact of criterion and test correlation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2014
Same author

Understanding protocol performance: impact of test performance.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2014
Same author

Partial allograft replacement of the radial head in the management of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2011
Same author

Evaluating a model to predict protocol performance.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2010
Same author

Complications of distal radius fractures.

Hand clinics·2009

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Traditional audiological masking methods, like the plateau method, can be time-consuming.
  • Developing efficient and valid masking protocols is crucial for accurate hearing threshold determination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an optimized masking method and compare its efficiency and validity against the traditional plateau method.
  • To establish a comprehensive masking protocol suitable for all audiological testing scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of a previously developed optimized masking method.
  • Direct comparison of the optimized method with the traditional plateau method.
  • Identification of specific conditions where the optimized method is less suitable.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The optimized masking method is generally faster than the plateau method.
  • The optimized method requires fewer masking levels, contributing to its speed.
  • Specific limitations of the optimized method in certain masking situations were identified.

Conclusions:

  • The optimized masking method offers a faster alternative to the plateau method in most audiological masking situations.
  • A hybrid masking protocol, combining the optimized method with a variation of the plateau method, is recommended for universal applicability.
  • This recommended protocol ensures valid threshold measures efficiently across diverse audiological testing contexts.