Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple regression analysis of twin data: a model-fitting approach.

S S Cherny1, J C DeFries, D W Fulker

  • 1Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0447.

Behavior Genetics
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SNP-based HLA allele tagging, imputation and association with antiepileptic drug-induced cutaneous reactions in Hong Kong Han Chinese.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2017
Same author

MAXIMUM VARIANCE LINEAR COMBINATIONS FROM PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL COVARIANCE MATRICES.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Factor Analysis Of Genetic And Environmental Correlation Matrices.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Multivariate Familial Analysis of Cognitive Measures in the Colorado Family Reading Study.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Reciprocal causation models of cognitive vs volumetric cerebral intermediate phenotypes for schizophrenia in a pan-European twin cohort.

Molecular psychiatry·2015
Same author

Reciprocal causation models of cognitive vs volumetric cerebral intermediate phenotypes for schizophrenia in a pan-European twin cohort.

Molecular psychiatry·2014
Same journal

Was the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Abhorrent or Just Controversial?

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects on Child ADHD Traits in Early and Mid-Childhood: Trio Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analyses in a Large Norwegian Birth Registry Cohort.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Behavioral Disinhibition Model of Addiction: A Review and New Findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Tracing the Right Path: Determination of Large Pedigree Segmentation and Relatedness.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Genetic and Environmental Associations Between Processing Speed and Executive Functions Across Adolescence and Established Adulthood.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Heritability of Functional Literacy: Evidence from a Classical Twin Design.

Behavior genetics·2026
See all related articles

This study compares the DeFries and Fulker (DF) regression method with maximum-likelihood estimation for analyzing twin data. Both methods provide similar estimates for genetic and environmental parameters, highlighting the utility of the DF approach.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Biometrical Genetics

Background:

  • Twin studies are crucial for disentangling genetic and environmental influences on traits.
  • Traditional methods like maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) are powerful but can be complex.
  • The DeFries and Fulker (DF) regression method offers a conceptually simpler approach to twin data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the multiple regression methodology of DeFries and Fulker (DF) with maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) for analyzing twin data.
  • To derive expectations for regression coefficients in submodels omitting genetic (h2) and shared environmental (c2) terms.
  • To demonstrate model comparisons using multiple regression techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of DF multiple regression methodology with MLE of genetic and environmental parameters from covariance structure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Derivation of expected regression coefficients for submodels.
  • Illustration of model comparison techniques using multiple regression.

    • Main Results:

    • Submodels of the augmented DF model produced parameter estimates highly similar to those from traditional latent variable models.
    • Model comparisons using multiple regression yielded results comparable to MLE procedures.
    • The DF methodology, when extended with model fitting, provides a flexible and understandable approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed model-fitting approach extends the DF methodology effectively.
    • While MLE may be optimal, the DF approach offers a valuable and accessible alternative for estimating genetic and environmental parameters in twin studies.