Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stenting after ureteroscopy: pros and cons.

Bodo E Knudsen1, Darren T Beiko, John D Denstedt

  • 1Division of Urology, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario N6A4V2, Canada.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|March 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Editorial Comment on "Clinical Outcomes Comparing Mini Versus Standard PCNL Without Postoperative Nephrostomy Tube: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial From the EDGE Consortium.

Urology·2026
Same author

Editorial Commentary.

Urology practice·2025
Same author

Clinical Outcomes Comparing Mini Versus Standard PCNL Without Postoperative Nephrostomy Tube: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial From the EDGE Consortium.

Urology·2025
Same author

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

European urology focus·2025
Same author

Thulium Fiber Laser: Long Pulse Width as an Independent Risk Factor for Excessive Heat Generation.

Journal of endourology·2025
Same author

Multi-site microbiota alteration is a hallmark of kidney stone formation.

Microbiome·2023

Routine ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy is often unnecessary, causing increased pain and costs. Identifying specific patient subgroups who benefit from stenting requires further research.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Patient Outcomes

Background:

  • Ureteroscopy is a common procedure for treating kidney stones.
  • Ureteral stents are frequently placed post-ureteroscopy to prevent obstruction.
  • The necessity and impact of routine stenting are debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the necessity of routine ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy.
  • To assess the impact of ureteral stents on patient pain and voiding symptoms.
  • To analyze the cost-effectiveness and readmission rates associated with ureteral stenting.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of numerous clinical trials.
  • Comparison of outcomes between stented and non-stented patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of patient-reported pain, voiding symptoms, and hospital readmission rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary for all patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy.
    • Stented patients report significantly higher levels of pain and irritative voiding symptoms.
    • Routine stenting increases procedure costs and is associated with higher hospital readmission rates in specific subgroups.

    Conclusions:

    • The routine use of ureteral stents after uncomplicated ureteroscopy should be reconsidered.
    • Non-stented management may improve patient comfort and reduce healthcare costs.
    • Further research is needed to identify patient subgroups who benefit from ureteral stenting.