Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Will the real Charles Fried please stand up?

Paul B Miller1, Charles Weijer

  • 1University of Toronto, Canada.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|March 31, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may conflict with physicians' duties to patients. Informed consent alone does not replace patients' rights to personalized care and judgment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supporting Informed Surrogate Decision-Making in Deceased Donor Intervention Research: Co-Creating Educational Materials With Families.

Critical care explorations·2026
Same author

Practical guide for determining whether healthcare providers are research participants in cluster randomised trials.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

The ethical permissibility of financial incentives.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same author

Recognition, remuneration and reimbursement of patient and public involvement partners in pragmatic randomised controlled trials. A survey of author practices.

Research involvement and engagement·2025
Same author

Patient engagement and shared decision-making in trial recruitment intervention studies: a systematic review.

Research involvement and engagement·2025
Same author

Organ procurement organizations should develop policy regarding surrogate consent for normothermic regional perfusion.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • This analysis responds to Jerry Menikoff's commentary on randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
  • It clarifies that the core ethical concern is not the absence of consent, but the inherent tension between RCT design/conduct and physicians' personal care duties.

Discussion:

  • Fried's perspective highlights that informed consent in RCTs does not fully address the ethical complexities.
  • The principle of equipoise, while crucial for justifying RCTs, cannot override the ethical imperative for personalized judgment and care for ill subjects.

Key Insights:

  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) present ethical challenges beyond informed consent.
  • Physicians' duties of personal care to patients are potentially compromised by standard RCT protocols.
  • The ethical justification of equipoise in RCTs is distinct from ensuring patient-centered care.

Outlook:

  • Further examination of RCT methodologies is needed to better align research practices with physicians' duties of care.
  • Developing ethical frameworks that integrate equipoise, informed consent, and personalized patient care is essential for future clinical research.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos