Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
Published on: February 23, 2015
The reasonable woman standard: effects on sexual harassment court decisions
Elissa L Perry1, Carol T Kulik, Anne C Bourhis
1Teachers College. Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA. ep248@columbia.edu
Abstract:
Some federal courts have used a reasonable woman standard rather than the traditional reasonable man or reasonable person standard to determine whether hostile environment sexual harassment has occurred. The current research examined the impact of the reasonable woman standard on federal district court decisions, controlling for other factors found to affect sexual harassment court decisions. Results indicated that there was a weak relationship between whether a case followed a reasonable woman precedent-setting case and the likelihood that the court decision favored the plaintiff. The implications of our findings for individuals and organizations involved in sexual harassment claims are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Halo Effect
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

