Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiologic technologists and ethical reasoning.

Bette A Schans1

  • 1Radiologic Technology Program, Mesa State College, Grand Junction, Colo., USA.

Radiologic Technology
|April 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

An Intentional and Ethical Integration of AI in Medical Imaging.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Benefits of Integrating AI Into Computer-Aided Detection Systems.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

A Practice-Aligned Approach to Integrating AI in Radiation Sciences Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Site Visitors: The Unsung Heroes of the Accreditation Process.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Extended Reality Innovations in Medical Imaging Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
See all related articles

Ethical reasoning levels in radiologic technology students and practitioners showed minimal differences. However, integrating ethical instruction may enhance postconventional reasoning in these professionals.

Area of Science:

  • Radiologic technology
  • Medical ethics
  • Professional education

Background:

  • Ethical reasoning is crucial for healthcare professionals.
  • Understanding ethical development in radiologic technology is important for quality patient care.
  • Previous research has not fully explored ethical reasoning across different stages of a radiologic technology career.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine and compare levels of ethical reasoning among radiologic technology students and practitioners.
  • To identify differences in ethical reasoning schemas using the Defining Issues Test (DIT2).
  • To assess the potential impact of ethical instruction on ethical reasoning development.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analysis was employed to compare ethical reasoning levels.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three groups were assessed: beginning students, graduating students, and practitioners 3-5 years postgraduation.
  • The Defining Issues Test (DIT2) was used to evaluate ethical reasoning schemas.

    • Main Results:

    • Few significant differences were found in postconventional ethical reasoning levels across the three groups.
    • Significant differences were observed in specific ethical reasoning schemas as measured by the DIT2.
    • No substantial variations in overall postconventional ethical reasoning were detected between students and early-career practitioners.

    Conclusions:

    • Current ethical reasoning levels show limited progression from student to early practitioner stages in radiologic technology.
    • The Defining Issues Test (DIT2) revealed nuances in ethical reasoning schemas that warrant further investigation.
    • Integrating targeted ethical instruction into radiologic technology curricula may foster higher levels of postconventional ethical reasoning.