Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical malpractice as an epidemiological problem.

Michelle M Mello1, David Hemenway

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 667 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mmello@hsph.harvard.edu

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|April 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advertising in AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support Tools.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Ethical Assessment of Generative AI Tools for Clinical Summarization Tasks.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

False positive paradox in survey research: examples from gun studies.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2026
Same author

Utah's Experiment With AI-Driven Prescription Renewals.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Mitigating Bias in Sepsis Risk Prediction Models: Insights from a Stakeholder-Based Ethical Assessment.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Toward a typology of government-sanctioned child maltreatment: A scoping review of the harms of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of women in the slums of Guwahati city (Assam, India): A qualitative analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Violence prevention through legislative change: Qualitative insights on ending the physical punishment of children in the UK.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

The medical malpractice system may not deter healthcare negligence as expected. While injured patients are more likely to sue, the rarity of claims means hospitals may see few reductions in lawsuits even with improved patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Law
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Malpractice

Background:

  • The tort liability system is proposed as a deterrent to healthcare negligence.
  • Existing data suggest a weak link between adverse events and malpractice claims.
  • This is often attributed to a mismatch between injured patients and claimants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the deterrent effect of the tort liability system on healthcare negligence.
  • To analyze the relationship between medical injuries and malpractice claims using epidemiological principles.
  • To assess the impact of patient safety improvements on malpractice claim rates.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from two large US studies on medical injuries and malpractice claims.
  • Applied an analogy from screening tests in epidemiology (false positives for rare diseases).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the likelihood of claims following negligent vs. non-negligent injuries.

    • Main Results:

    • Most malpractice claims do not involve actual negligent injury.
    • Patients with negligent injuries are over 20 times more likely to file a claim.
    • Despite this, improvements in negligent injury rates may not significantly reduce overall claim rates due to 'false positives'.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard interpretation of malpractice data may overlook complexities.
    • The deterrent effect of the tort system on healthcare negligence is nuanced.
    • The 'business case for patient safety' is perspective-dependent based on these findings.