Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
First human chronic experience with cardiac contractility modulation by nonexcitatory electrical currents for
Carlo Pappone1, Giuseppe Augello, Salvatore Rosanio
1Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. pappone.carlo@hsr.it
Insights
This study shows Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy is safe and improves heart failure symptoms. CCM therapy significantly enhances systolic function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with severe heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Conventional electrical therapies for heart failure (HF) include defibrillation and ventricular resynchronization.
- Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) uses non-excitatory electrical currents to enhance systolic function in HF patients.
- This study assesses the chronic safety and preliminary efficacy of an implantable CCM device.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term safety and feasibility of an implantable Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) device.
- To assess the preliminary clinical efficacy of CCM therapy in patients with drug-resistant heart failure.
- To determine the impact of CCM on systolic performance, symptoms, and functional status.
Main Methods:
- Thirteen patients with NYHA class III heart failure received the OPTIMIZER II CCM device.
- CCM pulses were delivered for 3 hours daily (8 weeks) then 7 hours daily (24 weeks).
- Safety, feasibility, ejection fraction (EF), NYHA class, 6-minute walking test (6-MWT), peak O2 uptake (peak VO2), and quality of life (MLWHFQ) were assessed.
Main Results:
- All 13 patients survived without heart transplantation or LVAD support during 8.8 months follow-up.
- No proarrhythmic effects were observed on Holter monitoring; no device malfunctions occurred.
- Significant improvements were noted in EF (22.7% to 37%), 6-MWT (418m to 510m), MLWHFQ (36 to 7), peak VO2 (13.7 to 16.2), and NYHA class (3 to 1.5).
Conclusions:
- CCM therapy is safe, feasible, and shows no proarrhythmic effects in this patient cohort.
- Preliminary data suggest CCM therapy gradually and significantly improves systolic performance, symptoms, and functional status in heart failure.
- Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate CCM as an additive treatment for severe heart failure.
Introduction:
Conventional electrical therapies for heart failure (HF) encompass defibrillation and ventricular resynchronization for patients at high risk for lethal arrhythmias and/or with inhomogeneous ventricular contraction. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) by means of nonexcitatory electrical currents delivered during the action potential plateau has been shown to acutely enhance systolic function in humans with HF. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the chronic safety and preliminary efficacy of an implantable device delivering this novel form of electrical therapy.
Methods And Results:
Thirteen patients with drug-resistant HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III) were consecutively implanted with a device (OPTIMIZER II) delivering CCM biphasic square-wave pulses (20 ms, 5.8-7.7 V, 30 ms after detection of local activation) through two right ventricular leads screwed into the right aspect of the interventricular septum. CCM signals were delivered 3 hours daily over 8 weeks (3-hour phase) and 7 hours daily over the next 24 weeks (7-hour phase). Safety and feasibility of this novel therapy were regarded as primary endpoints. Preliminary clinical efficacy, -as expressed by changes in ejection fraction (EF), NYHA class, 6-minute walking test (6-MWT), peak O(2) uptake (peak VO(2)), and Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), was assessed at baseline and at the end of each phase. At the end of follow-up (8.8 +/- 0.2 months), all patients were alive, without heart transplantation or need for left ventricular assist device. Serial 24-hour Holter analysis revealed no proarrhythmic effect. No devices malfunctioned or failed for any reason other than end-of-battery life. Throughout the two study phases, EF improved from 22.7 +/- 7% to 28.7 +/- 7% and 37 +/- 13% (P = 0.004), 6-MWT from 418 +/- 99 m to 477 +/- 96 m and 510 +/- 107 m (P = 0.002), MLWHFQ from 36 +/- 21 to 18 +/- 12 and 7 +/- 6 (P = 0.002), peak VO(2) from 13.7 +/- 1.1 to 14.9 +/- 1.9 to 16.2 +/- 2.4 (P = 0.037), and NYHA class from 3 to 1.8 +/- 0.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.7 (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
CCM therapy appears to be safe and feasible. Proarrhythmic effects of this novel therapy seem unlikely. Preliminary data indicate that CCM gradually and significantly improves systolic performance, symptoms, and functional status. CCM therapy for 7 hours per day is associated with greater dispersion near the mean, emphasizing the need to individually tailor CCM delivery duration. The technique appears to be attractive as an additive treatment for severe HF. Controlled randomized studies are needed to validate this novel concept.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

