Related Experiment Videos
Developing a peer review process for web-based curricula: minting a new coin of the realm
Christopher L Knight1, Henry A Sakowski, Bruce L Houghton
1University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. cknight@u.washington.edu
Abstract:
The World Wide Web creates new challenges and opportunities for medical educators. Prominent among these are the lack of consistent standards by which to evaluate web-based educational tools. We present the instrument that was used to review web-based innovations in medical education submissions to the 2003 Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) national meeting, and discuss the process used by the SGIM web-based clinical curriculum interest group to develop the instrument. The 5 highest-ranked submissions are summarized with commentary from the reviewers.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Critical Thinking II
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Critical Thinking I